It is a joy to celebrate this solemnity of Corpus Christi
with you, especially as it comes just a day after the fifth anniversary of my ordination to the
sacred priesthood. Last night, as I celebrated at dinner with Father Chrismer and a few
friends, I realized that I’ve probably offered over 2,000 Holy
Masses; most of them at the parish, some in remote parts of the US, some in
historic places in Europe. But what keeps coming back to me is something I saw
when I offered Mass at a local religious community. In the sacristy, there was
a plaque that read,
“Priest of God, offer this Mass as if it were your first
Mass; as if it were your last Mass; as if it were your only Mass.”
That’s a pretty amazing sentiment, actually. I remember
my First Mass: there was excitement, there were tears, a longing to do things
right, a profound reverence, and a total amazement at the realization that,
while I held bread and wine in my hands, it was miraculously changing by God’s
grace into His Son, Our Lord Jesus Christ. “Priest of God, offer this Mass as
if it were your first Mass...”—yeah, that would make me more attentive at this Mass
today.
And what if this was my last Mass? First, may God see
that day many years from now—but, if this were my last Mass, there would be
greater devotion, a greater sorrow for sin, and a more fervent prayer for
heaven, I think.
And if this was my only Mass?—my one and only Eucharist,
ever—well, I would do everything in my power to have my heart open to receive
everything and everything of God’s grace that I could. I would be so focused,
so attentive—I would want to remember it all.
Yes, I think those sentiments are good. And not only for
the priest, but for all of us: receive Holy Communion today as if it were your
first, your last, and your only. That would change things a little, wouldn’t
it?
* * *
Yet, I think the question should be asked: why is such a
plaque necessary in the vesting area of the priests?
The reality is that even priests face difficulties of faith.
It is so easy, especially after 2,000 Masses, to take
things for granted; to become lukewarm by routine. It’s even easy to question—because,
after all, there is so much hardship out there in the world and, Lord, are you
here? Are you hearing my prayers? The temptation to become discouraged and to
doubt is so real. Even priests need strong reminders to spurn on their hearts
and their faith.
Today, I wish to give you a little more to help our
faith. Good sentiments are nice. But, it also helps our faith when there are
solid, intellectual reasons. Faith, after all, is not blindness—it isn’t
a “leap in the dark.” There are reasons. So, I wish to give you some of the
more heady reasons today—reasons to keep on believing. Admittedly, these may
not make a lot of sense here. But, chew on them a little. Give them some time
and some reflection.
* * *
When it comes to describing what a thing is, Catholic philosophers
use words such as “substance” and “accident.” Accident is not like a car-crash; rather,
accident simply means those things that we can see and sense. So, you’ll notice
that I have a book here. It’s Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien. (He was a
daily communicant and came up with something called Lembas Bread as an allusion
to the Eucharist. I digress). Anyway, here is a book—its accidents are that it
is white, it is a little torn on the spine, and when I smell it… it smells old.
Those are its accidents. It’s substance is that it IS a book.
So, the substance is what a thing IS; the accidents are
what we sense about that thing.
Ok, so let’s presume that I drop this book into a fire.
(I know, philosophy comes up with all sorts of weird situations). But let’s say
I drop this book into a fire. The book will quickly burn up. And everything
about it will change. It will no longer be white, but black; it will no longer
smell old, but of fire (if it smells at all); and so on. In other words, the
accidents of the book will have changed.
And if the book burns for quite some time, then even its
substance will change. No longer will it be a book, it will be simply a pile of
ashes. Someone passing by won’t recognize that it ever was a book—only ash.
That’s called a substantial change.
The reason why I mention all of this is because, when
things change dramatically, we are used to seeing them change in both accident
and substance. When the substance of a book changes into the substance of ash, all the accidents change with it. Rarely do we see something change in its substance without
seeing its accidents change too.
But when it comes to the Eucharist, substances change
while that accidents do not. This is called “transubstantiation”: the
substance of wine, for example, changes into Jesus Himself; but the accidents
of wine remain the same. In other words, what’s in the chalice still smells
like wine, it still looks like wine, it still tastes like wine—all of its
accidents still are wine—but the substance has changed into Jesus, God Himself:
body, blood, soul, and divinity.
* * *
Someone might ask: But how do we know that? If I can’t
see it change, then how do I know the substance has changed? Great question.
If a person is blind, how does she remain on a path? Not
by her sense of sight; rather, she lets someone lead her. She must trust. So, the real question is: when it comes to the Eucharist, who should we trust?
Enter the Gospel today.
In the Gospel, we see Jesus changing five loaves of bread
into food enough to feed five thousand. That’s pretty impressive. Miraculous,
really. If we keep on reading the story (as found in the Gospel of John, chapter 6), we
see that Jesus does another miracle: he walks on water. Now, when Jesus does a
miracle, there is often a teaching attached to it (He does the miracle to prove to
people that He can be trusted and His teaching believed). So, here Jesus is
doing two of His most iconic miracles. The question for all of us is: what is
the teaching in which He wants us to believe?
Well, after the multiplication of the loaves and the
walking on the water, Jesus gives His teaching when He says:
“The
bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world” (Jn 6:51).
There it is.
The Eucharist is no longer bread but Jesus
because Jesus Himself says so. And we can trust that.
Paul and the early Catholic Church bears witness to this when in his First Letter to the church at Corinth, Paul writes:
“whoever eats the
bread or drinks the
cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the
body and blood of the Lord.”
Of sinning?! If the
Eucharist is just a symbol, what does it matter if we eat it in an unworthy
manner? But, if it is Jesus—well, then that’s a whole ‘nother matter!
Yes, at every Holy Mass, God
miraculously changes bread and wine into Jesus. And this is something we can believe in-- for isn't Jesus and the testimony of His saints trustworthy?
* * *
Of course, Jesus knows that we struggle to trust. He
knows that we want to see for ourselves. This is actually the basis of today’s solemnity of
Corpus Christi.
Way back in the 1200s, there was a priest that was
struggling to believe that Jesus was really present in the Eucharist. The
priest was at the altar in the usual way. And in the usual way, the bread and
wine were miraculously changing into Jesus, And just
like at every Mass, the priest couldn’t see the change. The substance had
changed, but not the accidents.
Until, that is, the priest elevated the host. At that
moment, God also changed the accidents: the priest could see that it was no
longer bread, but the very body and blood of Jesus. And as the priest was
holding the host, blood started to pour from the host, onto the priest’s hands,
and onto the linens on the altar.
This miracle was verified by many and inspired the Pope
at the time to institute this special celebration of Corpus Christi-- the Body of Christ. Some of the prayers and music
that we have today were composed by St. Thomas Aquinas specifically for this solemnity.
* * *
But, I know that there are still some skeptics out there
who say, “Yeah, but that’s not scientifically provable. That’s a nice story and
all, but you can’t prove that it happened.”
Well, I’m glad that you’ve said that (mwa ha ha), because
way back in the 800s, another similar miracle happened. There was another
priest who, you guessed it, doubted that Jesus was there in the Eucharist. And
so, during the Mass, not only did the substance of bread and wine change, but
so did the accidents. As the priest held the host, everyone could see that it
was flesh; and in the chalice, it was obvious that it was blood. The priest and
the people did not consume this Eucharist, but placed it in glass for all to
see.
Now, I know what you’re saying—that was over 1200 years
ago, so clearly it's not real.
Until we realize that in 1971
and again in 1981 scientists themselves examined these elements (still miraculously
intact after all those years, mind you) and declared that the flesh was clearly human flesh and,
specifically, from the wall of the human heart. They could not explain how this
was possible.
In fact, you can still go to Lanciano, Italy, and see for
yourself. ... I have.
But, I remember our Lord’s last words to Thomas, when Our
Savior said,
“Thomas, you believe because you
have seen. But blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe” (Jn 20:29).
* * *
If we ever should struggle with faith, let us be consoled
by these good reasons to believe; let us consider the words of our Lord Himself;
let us trust in His testimony, backed by His miracles, and by the witness of
the saints.
And if we should be lukewarm, let us be generous in our
acts of faith so as to spur us on: make a devoted sign of the Cross and a
profound genuflection; spend much time in the adoration chapel and don’t be
hasty; receive our Lord today as if it were your first communion, your last
communion, your only communion.
Because, after all, how would this Mass be different for you if you were
certain Jesus was here and that you were receiving Him?
Wouldn’t that change things?—and not only the bread and the wine?