So the question remains:
Why? Why did many of the disciples leave? And, as a follow up, why
didn't Jesus go after them?
Let's answer that first
question: why did they leave? The disciples leave for two reasons [and a third here added].
First, what Jesus said was
scandalous. Imagine you are going into Panera Bread Co and someone
approaches you and says, "Hey, if you want to get into heaven,
you have to eat my flesh." How would you react? I know how I
would: I would say, get away from me. Weirdo.
But here's the thing: what
if that person was known for healing people and for raising the dead?
What if he had some... credibility?
Didn't Jesus have some
credibility? Hadn't He just performed two of His most iconic miracles
on just the day before?-- namely, the walking on water and the
multiplication of the loaves? Sure, Jesus may have sounded weird, but
what about those miracles?
This is the second reason
why the disciples left: they forgot about the miracles and did not
credit it to Jesus' credibility. Had they remembered, they may have
been slower to leave and quicker to stay.
[[[A third reason-- and it's
a historical one. At the very beginning of His ministry, Jesus is
announced by John the Baptist. John points to Jesus and says,
"Behold, the Lamb of God..." John is alluding to the Lamb
of the Passover Supper (that's when Moses, at God's direction,
instructed the people to take a lamb, kill it, smear its blood on the
doorposts, and eat it. The reason for this was that, if this
sacrifice was offered and followed, the people would be saved from
the Angel of Death and delivered from Egypt). John points to Jesus
and says, "Behold the Lamb of God... who takes away the sins of
the world"-- in essence, He who frees us from this spiritual
Pharaoh (the devil) and his slavery (namely, sin).
The people see the
connection between this and when Jesus says that they must eat Him
(one of the requirements of the Passover Lamb) and they put two and
two together: if Jesus is the New Passover Lamb, that means that He
must also be killed (for that was another requirement of the Passover
Lamb).
This is too much for the
people. They came out to follow a Messiah that would overthrow the
Romans and give the people power and riches. They didn't come out to
follow someone who was going to be killed. They didn't want to follow
a loser-- they wanted a winner. So they left.]]]
And notice: this wasn't
about a hard teaching on marriage or some matter of morality. The
people were leaving because of the New Passover-- which we call the
Eucharist.
***
This brings us to the
second question: Why didn't Jesus go after them?
First, it's because they
understood correctly. They may have judged Jesus incorrectly, but
they understood the teaching correctly. Jesus didn't have to run
after them and say, "Hey, you misunderstood!"
Second, it's because He
had already given them everything necessary to stay with Him. He had
given them the miracles. And not just the walking on water. He had
healed their sick and expelled the demons and even raised their dead.
What more did they need?
Here's an aside: many
people think that Christians are just supposed to have "blind
faith"-- a faith that just blindly follows. That's not
Christianity. Jesus calls us to faith, but He gives us reasons. This
is important. If we don't have reasons-- if we forget the miracles
and the graces, for example-- we will fall away. Remember how I
started this homily: I told you one of the reasons why I believe. You
should have reasons, too.
This is important because
Jesus turns to Peter and asks Peter a poignant question-- a question
that every Christian must answer: "Do you want to leave as
well?" Or, in other words: "Do you have a reason to stay?"
Imagine it: Peter has just
heard the same things the crowd has heard. He has seen the same
things. And he has seen half of them leave. Can you imagine his
thoughts, the scandal, the struggle to believe?
Peter's faced with the
same razor's edge that Joshua posed to the people in our first
reading when Joshua said "Decide! ... Decide today whom you will
serve."
***
Peter responds quite honestly and in a way that I often find myself
responding these days. Peter says "Lord, to whom shall we go?
You have the words of everlasting life."
In other words:
In other words:
Lord, I don't understand how you are going to give us your flesh to eat and what this whole New Passover Lamb thing means. But, Lord, in the past-- in fact, just last night-- I saw your grace at work, "great miracles before [my] very eyes." You have "protected [me] along [my] entire [life's] journey"; you "brought [me]... out of slavery." And when you called me, something resonated in my heart such that I left everything so as to follow you. I have nothing else to go to. So, Lord, it's a choice between you or nothing. I choose you.
Notice: Peter is able to
accept the hard teaching because he remembers the miracles and, from
that, Peter gives Jesus his trust.
***
Are there any other hard
teachings that we encounter today? I can think of two.
Firstly, the second
reading has that line, "Wives, be subordinate to your husbands."
Let me simply say that if
your husband elbowed you in the ribs at that line, he misunderstood
it.
What is this passage
about? Is it about men and women? Look closer. Paul says, "I
tell you a great mystery and I speak in reference to Christ and His
Church."
In other words, Paul isn't
firstly talking about your marriage. Paul's talking about His--
Jesus'-- marriage. Jesus is the groom; the Church is the bride.
And what Paul is getting
at is: if we don't understand how Jesus treats the Church and how the
Church is to treat Jesus, then we will not understand how husbands
and wives are to treat each other.
Or, to put it another way:
Paul knows his scripture and he knows that, in the beginning, the
battle of the sexes and the domination over women came not as God's
plan, but as the result of sin. So why would Paul, a saint who rails
against sin and who follows Jesus (Jesus who upheld women to the
scandal of that day's culture)-- why would Paul encourage a structure
of sin?
The fact is: Paul does not
encourage such sin. Rather, he proposes something revolutionary.
"Look at Jesus," he is saying. "See how Jesus lowered
Himself even to the point of washing Peter's feet (for those who have
power must use it to serve)." This is the scandal of God: that
He so lowered Himself and became subordinate to humanity.
And to what purpose?
Jesus's goal is to bring His bride, the Church, to heaven. He will do
this by laying down His life.
Therefore, "husbands,
love your wives as Christ loved the Church."
To the ladies, Paul then
says, "Wives, is the bride of Christ called to love and follow
Him?" Of course-- every Christian is called to follow Jesus.
Paul then says, "Wives, would you follow Jesus-- knowing that
His whole purpose is to bring you to heaven and that He will lay down
His life for you to see it through?" What woman wouldn't?
Then Paul says, "Be
subordinate to your husbands as to the Lord." In other words, if
your husband is sitting at the feet of Jesus, if your husband's goal
is to bring you to heaven, if he is laying down his life for you,
then why wouldn't you go where he goes?"
The problem is, of course,
is two-fold: one, that many husbands don't sit at the feet of Jesus
and take on His ways; and two, many husbands who do take on His ways are not loved--
just like many in the Church don't love Jesus even though He loves
them.
So, what are we to do?
Remember the graces.
Remember the graces of
your marriage. Remember the miracles that have happened together.
Remember what Jesus has done for you. "And be subordinate to
each other out of reverence to Christ" who has been subordinate
to you!
Help each other to
remember. Build each other up. Wives, look for those reasons to
believe in your husband again; husbands, look for ways to deepen the
reasons for your wife to believe in you again!
***
That was the first hard
teaching. The second hard teaching is much, much briefer. And it
comes from the last two lines of the Sixth Chapter of John. For some
reason, they are omitted from today's Gospel reading (you can find them in your Bible at home, however). Anyway. After
Peter remembers the miracles and makes his statement of faith, Jesus
responds:
“Did I not choose you twelve? Yet is not one of you a devil?” He was referring to Judas, son of Simon the Iscariot; it was he who would betray him, one of the Twelve.
Ok, Peter, good. You remember and you are with me. But this is not the only time you will not understand. This is not the only time that you will be scandalized. One of your own-- not the crowds, not the people in the pews-- but one of your own, an Apostle and a bishop like you, will betray me. One of your own is going to be the cause of scandal.
And what will you do then? Will you remember the miracles? Will you remember the graces? Will you proclaim a living faith then?
I think such words are
important in our times. I addressed the clergy scandals at length in
my previous homily and noted many things that we as a church must do,
from support of victims, to holding people accountable, and so on
(and you can find that homily on my webpage).
But I think another thing
we must do during these times-- the mission that we have-- is
twofold:
One: remember. Remember
the miracles; remember the graces. God is with us; His Eucharist, His
Presence is here. And He gave that on the very night He was betrayed
by an Apostle, a bishop. Jesus foresaw what would happen and He gave
us all the reasons to keep on believing.
Two: go out and help
people remember. Help a scandalized and unbelieving world to remember
that there are miracles and graces and reasons to believe.
This is our faith. This is
our hope. Let us proclaim that now and ask our Lord to strengthen us
in it.
St. Theodore, pray for us!
+
Fr. Gerber, is there a way to listen to your homilies? ie an audio clip?
ReplyDeleteWe've been waiting 5 weeks to hear about the Eucharist like this. Thank you Father. I will remember❤
ReplyDelete